欢迎访问《中外公路》官方网站,今天是
分享到:
软土地基工后小荷载作用下不同沉降预测模型对比分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.长沙理工大学 交通运输工程学院 , 湖南 长沙 410114; 2.中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司 ,湖北 武汉 430056)

作者简介:

韩善鹏,男,硕士研究生.E-mail:hsp98@qq.com

通讯作者:

张军辉,男,博士,教授.E-mail:zjhseu@csust.edu.cn

中图分类号:

U416

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2021YFB2600900);中交建集团青年科技创新项目(编号:2021-ZJKJ-QNCX16);长沙理工大学研究生创新项目(编号:CX2021SS122)


Comparison Analysis of Different Settlement Prediction Models under Small Post‑ Constructio n Load on Soft Foundation
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering , Changsha University of Science & Technology , Changsha , Hunan 410114 ,China ;2.CCCC Se cond Highway Co nsultants Co .,Ltd., Wuhan,Hubei 430056 , China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    沉降变形是软土地基施工中须重点关注的问题,针对在实际工程中软土地基填筑后仍有小荷载施加情况,以云南省昭通市昭阳西环高速高填方段沉降监测数据为依托,分别采用双曲线法、三点法和星野法 3种沉降预测方法对填方地基的沉降进行预测、对比和分析,总结出各模型的拟合特点。对比拟合曲线和现场实测沉降曲线发现:路基加载会造成 3种方法的沉降预测误差较大;3种预测方法中,采用 n-1级填筑后间歇期及 n级填筑后间歇期的数据作拟合时,效果不如采用恒载期的数据,对于双曲线法和三点法,拟合选用的数据点时间间隔越长,预测效果越好;对于星野法,采用恒载期的数据拟合效果更佳。

    Abstract:

    Settlement deformatio n is a key conc ern in soft foundation construction.Since there is still a small load applied after the filling of soft foundation in the actual project,based on the settlement monitoring data of the high-fill section of Zhaoyang West Ring Expressway in Zhaotong City,Yunnan Province,three settlement prediction methods,namely the hyperbolic method,the three-point method,and the Hoshino method,were used to predict,compare,and analyze the settlement of the fill foundation,and the fitting characteristics of each model were summarized.By comparing the fitting curves and the actual settlement curves,it was found that the loading on the roadbed will cause large errors in the prediction of settlement for the three methods;when the three prediction methods use the data of n ? 1 level post-fill interval and n level post-fill interval for fitting,the effect is not as good as using the data of constant load period;for the hyperbolic method and the three-point method,longer time interval of the data points chosen for the fit indicates better prediction effect;for the Hoshino method,a better fit is achieved by using data from the constant load period.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

韩善鹏,付伟,张军辉,等.软土地基工后小荷载作用下不同沉降预测模型对比分析[J].中外公路,2024,44(6):1-10.
HAN S hanpeng, FU Wei, ZHANG Junhui, et al. Comparison Analysis of Different Settlement Prediction Models under Small Post‑ Constructio n Load on Soft Foundation[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway,2024,44(6):1-10.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
网站二维码
期刊公众号