欢迎访问《中外公路》官方网站,今天是
分享到:
钢管混凝土拱桥封铰混凝土浇筑时机对比研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1中交二公局第五工程有限公司,陕西 西安 710119;2长沙理工大学 土木与环境工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114

作者简介:

王晓亮,男,高级工程师. E-mail:183950023@qq.com

通讯作者:

王中强,男,博士,教授. E-mail:244949212@qq.com

中图分类号:

U445.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:52478129);湖南省教育厅重点项目(编号:23A0248)


Comparative Study on Pouring Timing of Sealing Hinge Concrete for Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Arch Bridge
Author:
Affiliation:

1CCCC-SHEC Fifth Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710119, China;2School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    钢管混凝土拱桥封浇混凝土浇筑时机直接影响施工工期及拱肋受力状态。为明确不同浇筑时机的结构响应差异,该文以广西平岑高速北流河特大桥为工程背景,采用Midas Civil建立其有限元模型,对比分析了以下4种封铰混凝土浇筑时机:封铰钢管对焊后;拱肋合龙后、管内混凝土浇筑前;管内混凝土浇筑后、格子梁吊装前;桥面板湿接缝浇筑后、二期恒载施加前。通过施工全过程有限元仿真分析,比较了4种时机下各关键部位的内力、应力、变形及成桥阶段的变形。结果表明:4种封铰混凝土浇筑时机均是可取的;从拱脚处弦管的强度及稳定性看,时机4(桥面板湿接缝浇筑后再浇筑封铰混凝土)最有利。只要不存在工作面冲突,封铰钢管对焊后的任何施工阶段均可进行封铰混凝土浇筑,产生上述现象的原因是该桥拱肋轴线为悬链线,恒载状态以受压为主,弯矩较小。研究成果为该桥封铰混凝土浇筑时机的选择提供了依据,可为类似桥梁相关施工提供参考。

    Abstract:

    The pouring timing of sealing hinge concrete for concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges directly affects the construction duration and the stress state of arch ribs. To clarify the structural response differences at different pouring timings, the Beiliuhe Extra-large Bridge on the Pingxi?Cenxi Expressway in Guangxi Province was taken as the engineering background in this paper. A finite element model was established using Midas Civil, and the following four pouring timings of sealing hinge concrete were comparatively analyzed: immediately after the butt welding of sealing hinge steel pipes; after the closure of arch ribs and before the pouring of concrete inside pipes; after the pouring of concrete inside pipes and before the lifting of lattice girders; after the pouring of wet joints of the bridge deck and before the application of the second-phase dead load. Through the finite element simulation analysis of the whole construction process, the internal forces, stresses, and deformations of key parts under the four timings, as well as the deformations at the completed bridge stage, were compared. The results indicate that all four pouring timings of sealing hinge concrete are feasible; from the perspective of the strength and stability of chord pipes at the arch feet, timing 4 (pouring the sealing hinge concrete after the pouring of wet joints of the bridge deck) is the most favorable. As long as there is no conflict in working surfaces, the pouring of sealing hinge concrete can be carried out at any construction stage after the butt welding of sealing hinge steel pipes. The reason for the above phenomenon is that the arch rib axis of this bridge is a catenary curve, which is mainly subjected to compression with a small bending moment under the dead load state. The research results provide a basis for selecting the pouring timing of sealing hinge concrete for this bridge and can serve as a reference for related construction of similar bridges.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王晓亮,付凯歌,张松,等.钢管混凝土拱桥封铰混凝土浇筑时机对比研究[J].中外公路,2026,46(3):142-149.
WANG Xiaoliang, FU Kaige, ZHANG Song, et al. Comparative Study on Pouring Timing of Sealing Hinge Concrete for Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Arch Bridge[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway,2026,46(3):142-149.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-27
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-04
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-06-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
网站二维码
期刊公众号