欢迎访问《中外公路》官方网站,今天是
分享到:
中国驾驶员对中英符号型交通标志及指路标志视认距离对比研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国路桥工程有限责任公司,北京市 100010;2.同济大学 交通学院,上海市 201804

作者简介:

王恒,男,硕士,高级工程师.Email: 183595499@qq.com

通讯作者:

杨轸,男,博士,副教授.Email:yangzhen5719@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

U461.91

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2022YFC3002604)


Comparative Study on Visual Recognition Distances of Chinese and British Symbolic Traffic Signs and Guide Signs for Chinese Drivers
Author:
Affiliation:

1.China Road & Bridge Corporation, Beijing 100010, China;2.College of Transportation,Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为揭示跨国背景下驾驶员对交通标志的视认性差异,并为视认距离差异相关研究提供方法参考,该文基于SILAB模拟驾驶平台,以三角形易滑标志、圆形解除限速标志以及指路标志为例,对比分析中国驾驶员对中英交通标志尺寸与驾驶员视认距离关系的差异。试验中保持同类型中、英交通标志的信息量、设置位置一致,并依据两国现行交通标志设计规范设置标志尺寸,结合数据回归特点,对比分析驾驶员对中英各标志视认距离与标志尺寸的关系方程斜率。研究数据显示:驾驶员对中英各标志视认距离与交通标志尺寸的关系方程斜率相近,在相同道路设计速度等级下,中、英两国解除限速标志设计尺寸范围相差较大。在指路标志尺寸及包含信息量相同条件下,驾驶员对中文指路标志的视认距离大于英文指路标志,对中文指路标志的视认距离与交通标志尺寸的关系方程斜率更高。针对中国驾驶员在跨国背景下对交通标志视认性差异的状况,建议加强对当地交通标志的适应性训练。研究结果可为国际驾驶安全教育及道路交通标志设计提供参考。

    Abstract:

    To reveal the differences in drivers’ visual recognition of traffic signs in a transnational context and provide a methodological reference for research on visual recognition distance differences, this study, based on the SILAB driving simulation platform, used triangular slippery road signs, circular end-of-speed-limit signs, and guide signs as examples to compare and analyze the differences in the relationship between sign size and visual recognition distance for Chinese drivers regarding Chinese and British traffic signs. In the experiment, the information content and location of the same types of Chinese and British traffic signs were kept consistent, and the sign sizes were set according to the current traffic sign design standards of the two countries. Combined with data regression characteristics, the slopes of the relationship equations between visual recognition distance for Chinese drivers and sign size for Chinese and British signs were compared and analyzed. The research data show that the slopes of the relationship equations between visual recognition distance for Chinese drivers and traffic sign size regarding Chinese and British signs are similar. Under the same road design speed, the design size ranges of the end-of-speed-limit signs in China and the UK differ significantly. Under the condition of identical sign size and information content, the visual recognition distance for Chinese guide signs is greater than that for British guide signs, and the slope of the relationship equation between visual recognition distance and sign size is higher for Chinese guide signs. In view of the differences in Chinese drivers’ visual recognition of traffic signs in a transnational context, it is suggested to strengthen adaptive training for local traffic signs. The research results can provide a reference for international driving safety education and road traffic sign design.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王恒,袁万富,任嘉铭,等.中国驾驶员对中英符号型交通标志及指路标志视认距离对比研究[J].中外公路,2026,46(1):240-248.
WANG Heng, YUAN Wanfu, REN Jiaming, et al. Comparative Study on Visual Recognition Distances of Chinese and British Symbolic Traffic Signs and Guide Signs for Chinese Drivers[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway,2026,46(1):240-248.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-28
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-21
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-05
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
网站二维码
期刊公众号