欢迎访问《中外公路》官方网站,今天是
分享到:
中外路面技术状况评价指标体系综述
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

东南大学 智能运输系统研究中心,江苏 南京 211189

作者简介:

陈磊磊,男,博士,副教授.E-mail:chenleilei@seu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U418.6

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:51308116);江苏省自然科学基金资助项目 (编号:BK20191267)


A Review of Pavement Condition Evaluation Index Systems in China and Abroad
Author:
Affiliation:

Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着道路运行条件日益复杂,提升养护决策的准确性与系统性已成为各国共识。路面技术状况评价指标体系作为支撑方案判断的核心工具,其构建方式与适用能力直接影响养护效率与资源配置水平。该文从指标模型构建逻辑、等级划分评分机制及适配道路等级条件出发,对中外典型国家评价指标体系特征进行对比梳理,并从管理理念、制度安排等深层角度揭示影响指标体系特征的内在成因。研究发现:国外部分体系强调结构分层响应或公众体验感受,而中国体系则强调统一部署和分层级向下管理。就中国而言,体系在通用性和标准化方面具备一定基础,但在阈值调整、场景适应与制度融合等方面存在明显短板。因此,该文提出结合养护目标设置动态阈值、增强对多类型道路运行环境的适应能力,以及推动评价结果与实际管理过程的有效融合等建议,为评价体系的结构优化与制度协同提供了思路支撑。

    Abstract:

    With the increasingly complex operating conditions of roads, it has become a consensus among countries to improve the accuracy and systematicness of maintenance decisions. Since the pavement condition evaluation index system is the core tool supporting the judgment of schemes, its construction method and applicable ability directly affect the maintenance efficiency and resource allocation level. Based on the construction logic of the index model, the scoring mechanism of grade division, and the conditions of road grade adaptation, the characteristics of the evaluation index systems in typical countries in China and abroad were compared and sorted out. The internal causes affecting the characteristics of the index system were discussed from in-depth perspectives such as management concepts and institutional arrangements. Research findings show that some systems abroad emphasize hierarchical structural response or public experience, while in China, unified deployment and hierarchical downward management are emphasized. In China’s case, the system has a certain foundation in terms of universality and standardization, but there are obvious shortcomings in threshold adjustment, scene adaptation, and system integration. Therefore, suggestions are proposed including setting dynamic thresholds in combination with maintenance goals, enhancing the adaptability to various types of road operating environments, and promoting the effective integration of evaluation results with the actual management process, which provides ideological support for the structural optimization and institutional coordination of the evaluation system.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈磊磊,杨李文韵,黎威,等.中外路面技术状况评价指标体系综述[J].中外公路,2025,45(5):61-74.
CHEN Leilei, YANG-LI Wenyun, LI Wei, et al. A Review of Pavement Condition Evaluation Index Systems in China and Abroad[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway,2025,45(5):61-74.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-12
  • 最后修改日期:2025-09-02
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-27
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
网站二维码
期刊公众号